<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Biofuel plant rejected in landmark planning decision</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bristol247.com/2010/02/24/biofuel-plant-rejected-in-landmark-planning-decision/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bristol247.com/2010/02/24/biofuel-plant-rejected-in-landmark-planning-decision/</link>
	<description>Bristol news, sport, opinion, information and digital marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 11:29:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: biodiesel backlash began yesterday in Bristol &#171; carbon limited</title>
		<link>http://www.bristol247.com/2010/02/24/biofuel-plant-rejected-in-landmark-planning-decision/comment-page-1/#comment-1564</link>
		<dc:creator>biodiesel backlash began yesterday in Bristol &#171; carbon limited</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 18:06:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bristol247.com/?p=7870#comment-1564</guid>
		<description>[...] a biodiesel generation plant proposed for Avonmouth near Bristol was rejected 6-2 in planning committee on the grounds of itsÂ  impact on rainforests on the other side of the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a biodiesel generation plant proposed for Avonmouth near Bristol was rejected 6-2 in planning committee on the grounds of itsÂ  impact on rainforests on the other side of the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: biodiesel fallout began yesterday in Bristol &#171; carbon limited</title>
		<link>http://www.bristol247.com/2010/02/24/biofuel-plant-rejected-in-landmark-planning-decision/comment-page-1/#comment-1562</link>
		<dc:creator>biodiesel fallout began yesterday in Bristol &#171; carbon limited</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 18:04:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bristol247.com/?p=7870#comment-1562</guid>
		<description>[...] a biodiesel generation plant proposed for Avonmouth near Bristol was rejected 6-2 in planning committee on the grounds of itsÂ  impact on rainforests on the other side of the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a biodiesel generation plant proposed for Avonmouth near Bristol was rejected 6-2 in planning committee on the grounds of itsÂ  impact on rainforests on the other side of the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suzanne Richards</title>
		<link>http://www.bristol247.com/2010/02/24/biofuel-plant-rejected-in-landmark-planning-decision/comment-page-1/#comment-1547</link>
		<dc:creator>Suzanne Richards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 22:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bristol247.com/?p=7870#comment-1547</guid>
		<description>Good on you Bristol!! Shame our Weymouth and Portland Councillors did not have your guts!! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good on you Bristol!! Shame our Weymouth and Portland Councillors did not have your guts!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Harrison</title>
		<link>http://www.bristol247.com/2010/02/24/biofuel-plant-rejected-in-landmark-planning-decision/comment-page-1/#comment-1545</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Harrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 21:17:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bristol247.com/?p=7870#comment-1545</guid>
		<description>I think this report misses the debate somewhat.  The fundamental question was whether the term &#039;natural environment&#039; in the Bristol Local Plan extended beyond the boundaries of the city or not.  The view of the planning officers was that it did not.  The counter view I put across strongly was that it has a wider application and that the Local Plan gives two specific examples to support this view.  Six members of the committee agreed with my interpretation, while two agreed with the officer interpretation.  An appeal would only be successful if the wider interpretation is considered unreasonable, but I don&#039;t think it will.   
 
The quotes from Cllrs Griffey and Lewis give the impression that the other committee members were swayed inappropriately by public opinion, but it was simply that they came to a different interpretation of the Local Plan. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this report misses the debate somewhat.  The fundamental question was whether the term &#039;natural environment&#039; in the Bristol Local Plan extended beyond the boundaries of the city or not.  The view of the planning officers was that it did not.  The counter view I put across strongly was that it has a wider application and that the Local Plan gives two specific examples to support this view.  Six members of the committee agreed with my interpretation, while two agreed with the officer interpretation.  An appeal would only be successful if the wider interpretation is considered unreasonable, but I don&#039;t think it will.  </p>
<p>The quotes from Cllrs Griffey and Lewis give the impression that the other committee members were swayed inappropriately by public opinion, but it was simply that they came to a different interpretation of the Local Plan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John A</title>
		<link>http://www.bristol247.com/2010/02/24/biofuel-plant-rejected-in-landmark-planning-decision/comment-page-1/#comment-1538</link>
		<dc:creator>John A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 18:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bristol247.com/?p=7870#comment-1538</guid>
		<description>Mikos: we are trying to stop all biofuel power plants. Not just the one in Bristol.  Sometimes people have to stand up and be counted. And those councillors did just that and Bristol should be proud of them. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mikos: we are trying to stop all biofuel power plants. Not just the one in Bristol.  Sometimes people have to stand up and be counted. And those councillors did just that and Bristol should be proud of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mikos</title>
		<link>http://www.bristol247.com/2010/02/24/biofuel-plant-rejected-in-landmark-planning-decision/comment-page-1/#comment-1537</link>
		<dc:creator>Mikos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 18:22:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bristol247.com/?p=7870#comment-1537</guid>
		<description>I predict: 
 
1. A successful appeal. 
2. Major nuclear investment. 
 
The BC councillors are big, idealistic fish, but in reality they are in a small pond. The power may be fed into the Grid elsewhere, but it will still be consumed in Bristol. Impact on the global environment? No different. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I predict:</p>
<p>1. A successful appeal.</p>
<p>2. Major nuclear investment.</p>
<p>The BC councillors are big, idealistic fish, but in reality they are in a small pond. The power may be fed into the Grid elsewhere, but it will still be consumed in Bristol. Impact on the global environment? No different.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn Vowles</title>
		<link>http://www.bristol247.com/2010/02/24/biofuel-plant-rejected-in-landmark-planning-decision/comment-page-1/#comment-1536</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn Vowles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 18:04:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bristol247.com/?p=7870#comment-1536</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve not long returned from this meeting. Lib Dem Cllr Neil Harrison spoke particularly well in his public statement -as did Green Cllr Charlie Bolton who made a very forceful and concise contribution. Several speakers from the public made moving statements on ethics. Lib Dem Cllr Alex Woodman showed an excellent grasp of planning regulations and played a key role in formulating the reasons for rejecting the biofuel plan. Shame on Conservative Councillor (and Committee Chair) Barbara Lewis and Labour Councillor (and former Lord Mayor) Royston Griffey for voting in favour of the plan - presumeably they feel that the natural environment does not extend much beyond Bristol (!) and that sustainability is an issue that can be considered in narrow terms! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;ve not long returned from this meeting. Lib Dem Cllr Neil Harrison spoke particularly well in his public statement -as did Green Cllr Charlie Bolton who made a very forceful and concise contribution. Several speakers from the public made moving statements on ethics. Lib Dem Cllr Alex Woodman showed an excellent grasp of planning regulations and played a key role in formulating the reasons for rejecting the biofuel plan. Shame on Conservative Councillor (and Committee Chair) Barbara Lewis and Labour Councillor (and former Lord Mayor) Royston Griffey for voting in favour of the plan &#8211; presumeably they feel that the natural environment does not extend much beyond Bristol (!) and that sustainability is an issue that can be considered in narrow terms!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Object Caching 530/531 objects using apc

Served from: www.bristol247.com @ 2012-02-07 14:28:36 -->
